Since I didn't get any replies, I am re-posting as follows:I am trying to figure out what, if any, may be the better way to play the new tax laws on education expenses. Here is the scenario:1. FT employee, FT student 2. Education is non-temporary (greater than one year in length)3. Enhances job (maintains/improves skills), does not lead to qualifying for a new career4. Spent approx $15k in 2001 for tuition, books, travel for conference5. Education expenses are not reimbursed by employerFrom the reading in Pub 17 and Pub 508, I qualify for Lifetime Learning Credit as well as work-related expenses deductions. I will fall into the phase-out segment on the credit, have not calculated the exact reduction in the credit but it will not be the maximum allowed.As I understand the rules, I can claim $5k in education expenses for the Lifetime Learning credit at whatever that phase-out works out to be. Now, can I also claim the work-related education expenses for the remaining $10k? I cannot find anything that states I cannot claim both the credit and the deduction. I did find a blurb that said I cannot claim the "same" expenses in mulitple places such as for the credit and the deduction. Am I reading the rules correctly? Alternatively, it may be better to forego the Lifetime Learning credit and use the entire $15k as work-related but I don't want to raise red flags with our friends at the IRS either. I try to be a conservative taxpayer and not go into gray areas most of the time.thanks for your opinions,Jenn
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. M