Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
BIG difference between stock analysis via the "Warren Buffet Way" and a stock in Warren's porfolio...don't confuse the two assessments or you might end up losing your ass......essments.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
I saw the Robert Hagstrom site at www.quicken.com/investments/strategies/whois/?picks=hagstrom

Hagstrom thinks Xeta has a per share intrinsic value of over $300 its OK to disagree but what is wrong with his calculation?.

Even if he is wrong I think his homepage is a good starting point to find undervalued stocks and I think Xeta could be a very worthwhile longterm investment (once they get their homepage sorted out!!).
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
They should calculate per share divedend instead of cash flow in determining its intrinsic value, but since there is no div. payout, its a little bit more difficult. ex. Net income + dep. - change in adjusted cash flow - capital spending will give you the "free cash flow" for the company. Determine the growth rate of the free cash flow and then discount. I myself bought 500 shares because the intrinsic value that I calculated was around 40 - 45 per share. 300 is a little too high and too optimistic.
Print the post Back To Top
No. of Recommendations: 0
Thats how I bought CD 3 months ago at 11 per share
Print the post Back To Top
Advertisement