No. of Recommendations: 0
<<Are you serious? The US economy hasn't been strong in the 20th century? Let me assure you that if you followed a DOGS strategy in the Zambia your average returns would have been quite low.>>

But how would the strategy have done compared to the Zambia market? Even if the average return is "quite low," if it beats the market, you've reached the goal of market-beating returns. Just saying that the average returns would be low doesn't say anything.

My question is, if you don't believe in the DOGS theories because the past performance doesn't prove anything, how do you choose stocks? It seems to me that most any method you might use to determine stocks with gains potential was derived by someone at some point and then tested from past data. If the back-testing indicated good results, you continue to use it. How is this different from DOGS?


Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.