Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Next Thread
Author: ChocoKitty Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 4981  
Subject: Reason number #6839 to FIRE Date: 4/8/2004 8:43 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 5
If I have to justify why I used the word "a" instead of "the" in a document one more time, I think I'll just fire myself.

Oh how I wish I were joking.

CK
Print the post Back To Top
Author: 85andbreezy Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 2249 of 4981
Subject: Re: Reason number #6839 to FIRE Date: 4/8/2004 11:41 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 5
Is that "a" reason or "the" reason?


85

>ducking and running<

Print the post Back To Top
Author: ChocoKitty Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 2250 of 4981
Subject: Re: Reason number #6839 to FIRE Date: 4/8/2004 11:50 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 5
LOL!!! It depends if the word "reason" has antecedent basis within a patent claim you're looking at. If you've mentioned "reason" before, then it would be "the" reason. If this is the first time you've mentioned it, it would be "a" reason, except if the word "reason" is part of a patent claim preamble and not meant to be a positive recitation of "reason" as an element.

You think I'm kidding? I've been getting reprimanded by a client for missing some of these in the piles of cases I do for it!

CK

Print the post Back To Top
Author: michaelangela Big red star, 1000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 2251 of 4981
Subject: Re: Reason number #6839 to FIRE Date: 4/8/2004 3:18 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 3
I've been getting reprimanded by a client for missing some of these in the piles of cases I do for it!

I like how you call the client "it"!

Print the post Back To Top
Author: ChocoKitty Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 2252 of 4981
Subject: Re: Reason number #6839 to FIRE Date: 4/8/2004 3:35 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Well, the client is a big corporation, so I didn't know what else to call it. I suppose the person who actually reprimanded me could be called "OCD Boy," but that wouldn't be nice.

CK

Print the post Back To Top
Author: michaelangela Big red star, 1000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 2253 of 4981
Subject: Re: Reason number #6839 to FIRE Date: 4/8/2004 3:46 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 1
I thought "it" was entirely appropriate for someone/something spending their days giving you grief over a vs. the. Such behavior does not merit a more personal pronoun!

Print the post Back To Top
Author: warrl Big funky green star, 20000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 2258 of 4981
Subject: Re: Reason number #6839 to FIRE Date: 4/12/2004 2:20 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 1
Well, the client is a big corporation, so I didn't know what else to call it. I suppose the person who actually reprimanded me could be called "OCD Boy," but that wouldn't be nice.

Is anal retentive hyphenated?

(The scary thing is: I know the correct answer. And no, I am not a copy editor.)

Print the post Back To Top
Author: FoolStreet Big red star, 1000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 2313 of 4981
Subject: Re: Reason number #6839 to FIRE Date: 5/11/2004 11:55 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 6
It depends if the word "reason" has antecedent basis within a patent claim you're looking at.

It depends if the word "reason" has antecedent basis within a patent claim at which you are looking.

:-)

Print the post Back To Top
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Next Thread
Advertisement