UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: salaryguru Big gold star, 5000 posts Top Recommended Fools Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 63148  
Subject: Reduced bonus Date: 1/14/2013 3:28 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 9
Jamie Dimon's Bonus Could Be Hurt By London Whale Loss

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/13/jamie-dimon-bonus_n...

. . .
JPMorgan’s board will weigh releasing an internal report this week that pins some of the fault for the bank’s “London Whale” trading loss earlier this year -- which cost the company more than $6.2 billion -- on Dimon, Bloomberg reports, citing “two people with direct knowledge of the matter.” What’s more, the board will likely cut Dimon’s bonus, the WSJ reports, citing “people close to the company.” . . .



This is pathetic. Executive screws up to the tune of $6.2B and he might lose some of his bonus. Sheeeesh . . . Clearly the word "bonus" means something entirely different for workers than it does for executives.

During my working years I never quite achieved career escape velocity - the kind of advancement that means you never have to face the searing pain of re-entry. I got close, but then I saved enough money to retire before I actually reached sustainable career orbit. I did, however, get close enough to career escape velocity to witness the differences in "bonus" compensation between workers and executives.

When I was an individual contributor, it didn't matter how I performed or what I did, if the company or group I worked in did not meet their goals, I got no bonus. Even when I got a bonus, it was likely that it represented a nice meal or, at most, a weekend away.

Once I entered the lower echelon of the executive branch, my bonuses were not entirely dependent on company or group performance. In fact, part of those bonuses were nearly guaranteed (short of complete corporate collapse). Typically the bonus was like an extra month's or several month's pay.

But at the next level up the corporate ladder, it wasn't even clear what executive bonuses were based on. It seemed mostly arbitrary. And the bonus money could sometimes be more significant than annual salary.

What did Jamie Dimon do during this past year to merit more compensation? What is really sad is that this article (and most corporate boards apparently) doesn't look at executive bonuses a something that should be added to base compensation for exceptional performance. They see executive bonuses as part of the compensation package that can be diminished in the case of severely poor performance.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Foolanthropy 2014!
By working with young, first-time moms, Nurse-Family Partnership is able to truly change lives – for generations to come.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

The Story Behind the Story
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement