My question, perhaps missplaced on this board, is why was this stock not identified as a buy in 3/09, south of $30/shr, vs today, 11/12 at $83/shr? Hindsight understood and accepted, but aren't the stock fundementals arguments for WAB the same. Why wasn't this on the radar then? I see this board goes back to 1998 for this stock, so my hat is off to those that were looking at WAB then. I sure would have liked to bought it in 2009. No criticism intended just looking for the selection process logic that misses this stock over ~$55 growth, while the fundementals remain virtually the same. Further, not the individual investor, but technology driven, analyst rich staff stock ID group.Please share any thoughts. My experience is in the novice range, so I accept I have much more to learn. Cheers!
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar