Shall we talk about Chicago schools? You can if you want, but we're talking about the entire STATE of Texas here, not just a city. If you want to compare Dallas to Chicago, feel free.Setting aside the partisan stuff....schools in the Metroplex are similar to those in Chicagoland, mainly that the public schools in the most affluent areas have the best metrics, while those in the poor inner city areas have the worst metrics. I can tell you that if you run a CORREL of SAT scores to percentage economically disadvantaged for every non-magnet high school in the entire Metroplex, you get a correlation coefficient of -0.88. Which is insanely high, but likely the case for almost every urban area in the country.I can also tell you that, in general, given "comparable" areas, the Chicagoland schools have slightly better test metrics than the Metroplex schools. TAG and SEM in Dallas are often rated as at or very close to "best high schools in the nation", but bear in mind that TAG had a class of 44 people in it in 2011, out of...I dunno, some 10,000 students in one class in all of DISD? It's great, but it's a HIGHLY competitive magnet. SEM is similar, about 89 in its class. You want I can get you the exact numbers.Hell, I'm gonna guess I've put more research into Dallas area schools than everyone else posting on this thread combined, as well as a comparison of them to Chicago area schools. But let's not have stuff get in the way of partisan sniping. That's much more fun.-synchronicity, has reasons to investigate Metroplex schools and think about them beyond scoring some political points. But yes, Texas public schools have lots of issues, and yes, I think about them Every.Darn.Day
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra