Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 2
Sorry for the late post on the link, which will probably only work for another 5 hours or so, but I didn't have time to post earlier.

WASHINGTON -- Sikorsky Aircraft has decided not to protest the Navy's decision to give the $6.1 billion contract for the presidential helicopter fleet to rival Lockheed Martin and its international partners.


Sikorsky, in a prepared statement, said that its VH-92 Super Hawk met the Navy's contract standards and had the best performing helicopter. But Lockheed's US101 cabin -- which is longer and wider than the Super Hawk's -- more closely met the requirements and was a key factor in the Navy's decision.

Translation: they know they don't have a leg to stand on.

Lockheed's US101 has several components, including the main transmission and rotor blades, that will be built overseas.

I have heard, but have not confirmed, that Sikorsky's airframe engineering was done in China. And, is Sikorsky claiming that they had no foreign components? I would seriously doubt it. Once again, you can't set a requirement and then say after the fact that the requirement is no good. I suspect that's another leg they couldn't stand on, and they knew it (or were told it).

Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.