Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (30) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: centromere Big red star, 1000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 423625  
Subject: Re: Rational discrimination? Date: 4/30/2012 2:55 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
So would you be OK with an employer asking if you have a spouse and children, since putting dependants on employer health insurnace benefits will cost the employer more?

It would be okay with me. If a single person provides an employer a cost/benefit advantage, then that person should have a hiring advantage. Happens all the time in many fields. A single person who can travel, work overtime, work holidays has an advantage over someone who for family reasons is more restricted. Not sure why health costs should be left out of the equation.

The more complex answer is that to my knowledge, employees with families typically pay a higher health premium than single employees. The added cost is shifted to the employee.

Why should the non-smoker/obese person get to "appear" lower cost, when they could have a chronic condition that's just not visible, or they could have dependants with chronic conditions?

Imagine yourself an employer of a small business barely surviving the economy. You have two candidates for a job opening who are equally qualified. One is normal weight. The other is obese. Your accountant tells you that over the next 10 years the obese person is likely going to cost you an extra $50,000 in higher health premiums and lost work days due to health reasons. Who would you hire?

Or suppose you are an employee for a small company. You find out that if the company hires a couple of obese people, it would raise health premiums for all employees $200/year. Would you want your company to have a BMI policy?

Any analysis is subjective to what you believe the employee will cost. You could assume female employee costs more because on average women tend to go through pregnancies - which would mean you're fine for an employer legally discriminating against all women, even though any particular woman might not want to have children.

Pregnancies represent a special case. We as a society agree that being able to have and raise children are good things and so we pass laws to facilitate those to occur. This includes laws against sex discrimination for the reasons you outlined.

In contrast, we as a society do not agree that obesity is a good thing.

Keep in mind that I'm not arbitrarily picking on the obese because I hate fat people. The facts are that health care costs are a big problem and that the rate of health cost increases will soon make it unaffordable regardless of the payment system we finally adopt.

The single biggest cost factor in health care are complications caused by obesity. The second biggest is smoking.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (30) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Invest Better Hub
Take advantage of our newest free service, Invest Better!
New Fool-Branded Credit Card Available!
How does your card compare to ours?
Post of the Day:
Berkshire Hathaway

Coolidge Lessons for Today
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Facebook Fool Fan Club
Be a fan of the Fool over on Facebook!
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Get the Fool Phone App
Save and share content, zero in on sectors, podcasts, and much more!
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement