Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Next Thread
Author: hastings4455 One star, 50 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 19371  
Subject: Social Security relief Date: 8/8/2000 12:28 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
In March, the U.S. House passed legislation that repealed the limit on the amount of money people aged 65 to 69 can earn without temporarily losing part, or all, of their Social Security benefits. President Clinton said he would sign the bill.
Does anyone know if the bill was, indeed, signed into law?
Thanks.

David
dalexan1@columbus.rr.com
Print the post Back To Top
Author: TMFPixy Big gold star, 5000 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 4723 of 19371
Subject: Re: Social Security relief Date: 8/8/2000 12:37 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
Greetings, Hastings4455, and welcome. You asked:

<<In March, the U.S. House passed legislation that repealed the limit on the amount of money people aged 65 to 69 can earn without temporarily losing part, or all, of their Social Security benefits. President Clinton said he would sign the bill.
Does anyone know if the bill was, indeed, signed into law?>>


Yes, the bill was signed, and it is now law retroactive to January 1, 2000.

Regards..Pixy

Print the post Back To Top
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Next Thread
Advertisement