Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: mungofitch Big gold star, 5000 posts Top Favorite Fools Top Recommended Fools Feste Award Winner! Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 14293  
Subject: Re: Sony's horrendous management Date: 11/26/2013 10:42 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 23
Sony makes wonderful TV's. Last year I researched all of them and bought
their top of the line 950. Since I enjoy TV a lot when I watch it, I
thought it was worth the $3400 (I got it cheaper). It was everything I expected.
Out of the box, the picture was and remains gorgeous. So why do I think Sony has horrendous management?


Another answer to that question:
Sony loses money making TVs. Huge amounts of money. They have done so steadily for many, many years.
When asked about whether they might one day close or sell this lossmaking division,
which for a shareholder amounts to nothing more than a very expensive hobby,
management said "We'll never stop making TVs. Our engineers are very proud of them."
So, I guess the costs of that division should be booked under "employee benefits".

A more quantifiable essay on exactly how bad management is.
http://brooklyninvestor.blogspot.com/2012/05/deconstructing-...
"Wow, so this is pretty awful. In the past [22] years, Sony has only generated a doubt digit ROE *twice*. Just twice. "

The worst thing is that this is so typical of so many Janapese firms.
They don't even seem to have ever heard of the notion that deploying capital
wisely is even a good idea, let alone a goal, let alone the only important one.
Absent changes in valuation multiples, the longer you hold a stock the
closer your returns will approximate the firm's ROE on newly deployed capital.

For a sense of scale, among companies over $500m market cap in Japan,
18% of them have five year average ROE over 10% and 6% have average ROE over 15%.
The equivalent figures for the US are 38% (versus 18%) and 22% (versus 6%).
Oddly enough, the only group who seems to realize there's a problem is the stock exchange.
There's a new index one of whose key criteria is high returns on capital.
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/516dc144-477d-11e3-9398-00144...
The new JPX-Nikkei 400 will be one to watch.
But the quote that sums things up: “Ultimately ROEs are low because people
don’t really care,” says Kathy Matsui, chief Japan strategist at Goldman Sachs.


Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (7) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement