|
Recommendations: 0
tgiletto,
>>This may or may not be true, but when you compare a $2000 Roth to a $2000 taxable account (i.e. not eligible for a standard IRA) then it is a big win.
I really don't see the "big win"?
Please explain.
I posted this before, but I can't find the link to it, so I will post this information again:
If one compares a Roth to a taxable account, assuming they get the same rate of return, the Roth comes out ahead because there is no capital gains tax on its increase in value.
I set up a spreadsheet with the following assumptions:
Tax Bracket - 28% Annual Rate of Return - 12% Capital Gains Tax - 20%
Here is the spreadsheet. The % Difference column is how much more the Roth returns over the Regular account. As you determined, a traditional IRA returns the same as a Roth after taxes.
Year Roth Regular % Difference Investment 1 2240 2192 2% 2 2509 2407 4% 3 2810 2648 6% 4 3147 2918 8% 5 3525 3220 9% 6 3948 3558 11% 7 4421 3937 12% 8 4952 4362 14% 9 5546 4837 15% 10 6212 5369 16% 11 6957 5966 17% 12 7792 6634 17% 13 8727 7382 18% 14 9774 8219 19% 15 10947 9158 20% 16 12261 10209 20% 17 13732 11386 21% 18 15380 12704 21% 19 17226 14180 21% 20 19293 15834 22% 21 21608 17686 22% 22 24201 19760 22% 23 27105 22084 23% 24 30357 24686 23% 25 34000 27600 23% 26 38080 30864 23% 27 42650 34520 24% 28 47768 38614 24%
Hope this helps.
LT
|
|
|
Announcements
|