Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: wranderson1 Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 157041  
Subject: Re: Consumers Injured? Date: 11/5/1999 9:45 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 105
Thanks for posting the excerpts from the findings of fact. It is abundantly clear that Judge Jackson's preferred solution would not be a Microsoft breakup or a massive fine, but his usurpation of Bill Gates's job. Even though I have experienced none of the problems the learned jurist describes(I may simply have not been bright enough to pick up on the performance decrements), I am sure that the aggregate damage done to millions of users was truly devastating. This reminds me of a notice for a class-action lawsuit I got several months ago. Because a monitor I had bought supposedly did not deliver the d.p.i. it promised, I could collect all of $16, even though I had noticed no problem. The Microsoft lawsuit belongs where that letter went, in the trash, because it is headed for a similar result: more money and power for lawyers (now THERE'S a monopoly). There was never a consumer groundswell against Microsoft because there was always an easy solution: buy a Mac. Undoubtedly many had their gripes about Windows, but decided to stick with it for one reason or another (less expensive hardware, ability to upgrade your own hardware, more software, etc.). Judge Jackson, a true elitist, believes that those people are so stupid that they must be protected from themselves. Just as war is too important to be left to the generals, the free market is too important to be left to the consumer. The various high-tech industries now amount to 25% of GDP, so the government must intervene to protect our economy. Well, with any luck that 25% can be reduced to 1% after just a few years of "Micro"management by Jackson and other anointed persons. Antitrust is much more subjective than other areas of law,and decisions are colored by one's political biases and attitudes toward capitalism in general. To a redistributionist, any business that leaves its competitors in the dust has ipso facto gained an unfair advantage.
If Netscape, Sun Microsystems et al. had spent their energy in competing with Microsoft instead of whining to the Justice Department, we all would be a lot better off. Instead, we are once again reminded of Orwell's description of politics as "the defense of the indefensible" as we edge closer to the Ultimate Monopoly, the one for which emigration will be the only remedy.
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Pencils of Promise - Back to School Drive
"Pencils of Promise works with communities across the globe to build schools and create programs that provide education opportunities for children."
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Implications of the Ballad of Ted Plotz
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement