No. of Recommendations: 12
Thanks for the kind words, but I want to point out one important aspect to the Dividend Growth Rates in the CCC document. If you look at the formulas, you'll realize that these numbers are based on completed calendar years. Currently, 2012 is compared with those prior years' full-year payments. So the most obvious weakness is that, as the year progresses, they will be less current, though accurate for the periods cited.
Why do I mention this? Because other sources will show DGRs that they attempt to make current on an ongoing basis, using various methods, sometimes unknown to the user. For example, they may use (as a base) the most recent four quarters' payments or they may use the current annual (indicated) rate. So, in a sense, they may be more current, but they also may fall prey to some "glitches," such as including Special Dividends or placing an accelerated payment in the wrong period. It's not that they are being sloppy; they're just trying to be automated.
Bottom line: No matter what the source, consider the method used (if known) and verify (if possible). The same can be said for any data being used, of course.
Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.