No. of Recommendations: 0
Thanks, Pixy, for the reply. Yes I'm talking about
asset allocation. Perhaps I can better explain what I
was getting at with a concrete example. To keep it
simple, suppose a mix of 80% stocks, 20% money market.
Naturally I would expect the value of the stocks
to grow faster. Say I start with $8000 and $2000.
Suppose the stock doubles, while the MM fund rises
10%. I now have $16000 and $2200. Adjusting back to
80-20, or roughly $14500 and $3700, seems kind of
self-defeating; the original strategy counts on the 80%
growing faster, and by putting some of those profits back into MM, you lose some of the compounding effects you
were hoping for all along. But of course by NOT making
the adjustment, you are in a potentially more precarious
position. Seems paradoxical, hence my confusion. Is that
any clearer? Many thanks for your thoughts,

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.