Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
That's not what the research shows.

Petey


Well no, that's really not true. Getting to $0 at the end of 30-years is definitely not a requirment or assumption of the REHP study. If you look at the pay out periods, what happens is that most of the time is that after 30 years the portfolio is worth several times its initial value. IIRC, about of 100 periods examined, there was only one period when the port wound up with less than its original value after 30 years.

So while the "uncontrollable slide to zero" you talk about is certainly possible, it doesn't seem very likely. Again using history as our guide, the most likely result is that after 30 years is that you wind up quite a bit richer than you started, in some cases a lot richer.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement