Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
[T]he 24-70 II F2.8 it is amazing. . . Mount the 70-200 f2.8 II on the 1DX . . .

Thanks for the feedback - greatly appreciated. Always nice to have my preexisting biases confirmed. I'm a little afraid I'd break a 5D3. I've got a couple other lenses, but probably 95% of my shots are done with the original versions of these two lenses. Are the "II" versions of these lenses a huge improvement? Is there much of a market for heavily used older lenses?

One of the things I love about the 1D Mark IV is its performance in low-light situations. I can crank the ISO up to 3200 or so and still get very nice pictures. Hopefully the 1DX has retained or improved this performance?

martybl
Print the post  

Announcements

Online Photos
Yahoo! Groups
(Registration Required)
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement