Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: VeeEnn Big gold star, 5000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 15353  
Subject: Re: Armstrong Date: 1/19/2013 7:59 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 2
The benefits gained from EPO and other oxygen-based doping meant that guys who once finished 30 minutes behind the leaders could now keep up and push the pace.

This is a bold statement to make because, let's face it, it's not something that's exactly open to study. It's an assumption based on the hypothesis that low oxygen availability is a performance limiter (and there's significant challenge to that idea....)


Armstrong was a perfect candidate for EPO and oxygen-vector doping because his natural hematocrit level was fairly low. He was supposedly able to increase the oxygen carrying capability of his blood by upwards of 15%. In an endurance sport where the differences between winning and losing is less than 1% that's a pretty big advantage....

Isn't that argument a bit reminiscent of Ed Coyle's contention that Armstrong was able to to perform the way he did because of some superhuman, never-before-reported increase in cycling efficiency and change in muscle fibre type due to training (when I first smelt fish, BTW) The data for claims like this need to be very robust. They weren't with Coyle.


He's a jerk.

Indeed he is. One of the reasons I've never cared for him that much (and quite possible why I was willing to label him a doper so quickly back when he was everyone' hero) Not at all a graceous person. Hugely selective with his races also, come to that.....unlike The Canniball who chased down everything he could (or so mythology goes....). But he still won......and he won convincingly against other competitors who were doping. Not a vindication for doping so much as a ferocious attitude to training (which is something that most folk can't hack with or without juice)
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (22) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Post of the Day:
Berkshire Hathaway

Brookfield Asset Management
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement