Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
The best strategy proved to be combining the original benchmark investing strategy with benchmarks using 5 years of data. The combination -- I'd hate to call it a "nickel and dime" strategy -- compounded annually at a spectacular 29.56% rate.

There have been so many BI variants!

Does this strategy run exactly like the one in the book, except read "5 years" each time you read "10 years" in the book? Or does the "and dime" imply that the ten year guidelines come in somewhere (selling?)

Thanks for all your help here.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement