No. of Recommendations: 2
The broker would have been required to keep written documention of discretionary trading authority.

Without such, the broker could be and should be legally liable for those trades.

The executor should easily be able to request a copy of that authorization by verbal or written request.

Orders that were called in would have to be marked unsolicited. In many cases, such trades for a 84 yr old would trigger a "principle review" by someone higher up in the food chain if they were actively trading.

I know in one of my accounts were the lady is in her 80s and with 300K in 100% stock, I got an inquiry on that even though I am not the one that sold her the stock (it was previously in certificate form). My Principal wanted to know why I had a client with so much stock at that age. We hadn't done a single trade but it still triggered an inquiry.

This means that even if your relative was calling in those trades on his own, the broker might have had some responsbility to advice him otherwise to diversify.
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.