Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 2
The code encourages and discourages all sorts of behavior. In this case it is discouraging high earning couples from marrying and encouraging married couples to consider divorce. I do not think it is just that an unmarried couple with the same earnings as my wife and I would pay $100k less in taxes over the next five years. Fix the code, I say, but until it is fixed I will consider this route. I admit it is drastic, but the tax savings is large.

one of the experts might know -- but istr tax law prof saying the math is such that you either 'penalize' high two-earner income marrieds
penalize one-earner couples ..
& Congress picked the former
(perhaps thinking they can afford it, perhaps thinking most in Congress are one-earners, perhaps thinking you have to 'pay' for the benefits of marriage .... all that stuff gay couples want, but can't have)

suspect your increase may be less about marriage penalty and more about the end of "Bush-era cuts"
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.