No. of Recommendations: 1
He noted Wednesday’s Senate committee vote and the endorsements from a range of senators, including from John McCain, Republican of Arizona, and the liberal Democrat Barbara Boxer of California. “What we’re seeing each day is an increasing number of members who are convinced that a military response is necessary,” Mr. Rhodes said. “But we’re going to continue to make the case to members.”
Tracking the Syrian Crisis

The Times is providing updates, analysis and public reaction from around the world.

9:28 AM Obama Will Speak to the Nation on Tuesday Night
9:08 AM Obama at G20 News Conference
4:35 AM A Firsthand Account From Syria's Front Lines

More Updates »
Multimedia
Video Feature
Watching Syria’s War
Syrian Rebels Attack Ancient Town
Related

Israel Backs Limited Strike Against Syria (September 6, 2013)
Iraqis, Looking Across Border, See Replays of Past and Fears for the Future (September 6, 2013)

World Twitter Logo.
Connect With Us on Twitter

Follow @nytimesworld for international breaking news and headlines.

Twitter List: Reporters and Editors

Privately, some members of the Obama administration appear concerned that General Dempsey’s presentations to Congress — particularly his repeated assertions that any American intervention in Syria is unlikely to have a decisive effect on the civil war — are undercutting the administration’s argument that the attacks, while targeted, would also change Mr. Assad’s calculus.

So as the target list expands, the administration is creeping closer to carrying out military action that also could help tip the balance on the ground, even as the administration argues that that is not the primary intent.

The bulk of the American attack is still expected to be carried out by cruise missiles from some or all of the four Arleigh Burke-class destroyers within striking range of Syria in the eastern Mediterranean. Each ship carries about three dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles, a low-flying, highly accurate weapon that can be launched from safe distances of up to about 1,000 miles.

But military planners are now preparing options to include attacks from Air Force bombers, a development reported Thursday by The Wall Street Journal. The Pentagon was initially planning to rely solely on cruise missiles.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/06/world/middleeast/pentagon-...


---

Looks like this is going to cost us TENS OF BILLIONS.

Just keeping the ships off the coast there costs hundreds of millions a week..and once they start flying, it is 100 million a day...and cruise missiles are 1.5 million each.....and they are talking 100 or more of them....

It costs 10 million probably to fly a B-2 from the US to there and back......


and when US facilities/ships are attacked and destroyed ....yet more tens of millions or hundreds in damage...


Meanwhile, we can't even afford to keep the Blue Angels in the air....just 4 planes....





t
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement