The fact of the matter is that is not true at all. As a proportion of income, the poor pay more in taxes. Not in income taxes, but all taxes. This started under Reagan, when the top rates were lowered, state and local communities had to scramble. Leaving out income taxes plays into a cynical ploy that they are separate issues, when the truth is the socio-economic-behavioral impact is based on the total burden.jwiestThis is a curious assertion, because when federal income tax rates were lowered under Reagan, tax revenue as a percentage of GDP actually increased.http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270230425930457637...If liberals were logical, they would have been in favor of the Reagan income tax *increase*.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar