Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
The intent of the law is to encourage the decision makers at a company (the assumption being that the most highly compensated employees also have the greatest influence) to encourage greater participation among their lower paid subordinates.

What is the law? And why would limiting the amount I can save for retirement motivate me to encourage greater participation among lower paid subordinates?

By tying contribution rates of the highly compensated group to that of the lower compensation group, hopefully management will educate employees and offer generous matching contributions to increase participation (thus allow themselves to contribute more).

How are the contribution rates "tied" between the two groups when one group is limited to a significantly lower rate? And how does my success in educating other employees allow me to contribute more (especially given that the decision makers of any large company are a very small minority at the top of the "highly compensated" group therein)?

Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.