Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: JABoa Big gold star, 5000 posts Feste Award Nominee! Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 121599  
Subject: Re: buy sister's residence & leaseback Date: 1/9/2001 9:01 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
The last two replies on this thread indicate why we always want to consider multiple go-arounds. Clearly Phil and I had different ideas about who would hold the mortgage, and I think Phil was right and I was mistaken.

If Sister holds the mortgage, which we can assume is 100% of the purchase price, then no large sums of cash are exchanged. What I see are two important things: 1)title now rests with you; 2)property taxes become deductible. Again, I will make some numerical assumptions just pulled out of the air.

Let's suppose the fair market value of the home is $150,000 and that property taxes are $200 a month. Also suppose Sister's SS income is $1000 a month.

Then, Sister is left with $12,000 - $2400 = $9600 after taxes, if there is no transaction.

If she sells to you for $150,000 and takes back a mortgage for that amount, then her monthly payment of $1100 from you is income. But her SS income is not taxed, and so her AGI is $13,200, and her standard deduction and exemption are $5500 + $2800, so her taxable income is $4900 and tax $739. So now she has $11,261 after taxes.

Meanwhile, you have expenses of $200 a month taxes, plus interest and repairs. To make it simple for me, let's suppose repairs bring the interest + repairs up to 8% of $150,000. So your total expenses of being a landlord are $2400 + $12,000 = $14,400, which are balanced by rent of $1100 x 12 = $13,200. So you have a loss of ($1200) which may become ($4000) after folding in depreciation. (I'm too lazy to look up the real numbers since these numbers are all fake anyway.) If you are in the 28% bracket, this represents a tax savings of $1120 to you.

So, the major monetary implication seems to be that without the transaction, Sister has to eat the property taxes (or, perhaps, not eat because the taxes must be paid) since she doesn't make enough to itemize, while you can deduct them on Schedule E.

I do not minimize the title question and what sort of friction that might cause. Would your sister really want to give up title for what, according to this admittedly wrong calculation, is $150 a month? And face eviction if you turn out to be an ol' nasty? (Not, of course, that I'm saying you are.)
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Disclaimer:
In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
Foolanthropy 2014!
By working with young, first-time moms, Nurse-Family Partnership is able to truly change lives – for generations to come.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Post of the Day:
Macro Economics

Looking at Currency Ratios
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement