No. of Recommendations: 0
The maximum benefit occurs if you made about $48,000 of today's dollars. There is an inflation adjustment factor for each year. If you look around hard enough at, you can find the tables. Now, suppose for the sake of argument, you had a few years of $60,000, followed by a few of $0.00. Then, your benefit will not be reduced, probably.

Of course, it will be reduced by age. If you are not going to work past 62, then you can look at mortality tables and come to the conclusion you should take the money and run. This is especially true if there is a history of early death in your family, or if you are otherwise at risk like being a lifelong smoker and/or very fat. (I'm just talking statistics, folks.) The real 62 vs. 65 question, it seems to me, is the clawback that occurs if you have earned income after 62. Then a calculation has to occur. Of course everybody's case is unique, but the clawback is bad enough that if you're an average guy and are planning on working more than 2, perhaps 3, days a week between ages 62 and 65, you're most likely better off to wait.
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.