Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
Why would the Motley Fool and Tom Gardner step in to this and recommend the Paulson plan? Are you seriously recommending that we go with a 3 page plan that:

1. Has no discussion on price discovery (I guess we'll just way over pay)
2. Has little or no oversight (let's hand our money over to the same frauds who created this problem)
3. Has no plan for triage (which banks can be saved, which should be liquidated)
4. Picks some arbitrary number as a bailout number without any justification (why $700B, why not more or less, how was this number chosen)
5. Has no discussion on how this would be paid for? Or where we would get the money from.

I could go on. If you want to do something helpful then recommend a real plan, not handing over $700B to the same group of neocon idiots who have been lying to us about the problem (it's well contained) or and who put us in this spot to begin with (moral hazard bailouts, lack of oversight, loosening of rules to allow more leverage, removal of depression era rules without replacing them with something fitting, lack of regulation on the CDS and derivatives markets)

Give me a break.

Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.