UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: rclaussen Three stars, 500 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 90262  
Subject: Re: Is the Grinch going … Date: 12/14/2011 8:48 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 2
The Senate recessed this evening about 7:35 PM without taking up H.R. 3630. This afternoon I listened to arguments presented for passage of the Keystone XL Pipeline Project. After hearing the arguments I sent the following Email to the House and Senate Leadership as well as the legislators for my state asking for a response.



The Honorable Dan Inouye
The Honorable Harry Reid
The Honorable Mitch McConnell
The Honorable Jon Kyl
The Honorable John A. Boehner
The Honorable Eric Cantor
The Honorable Kevin McCarthy (Would someone please forward to Senator McCarthy)
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
The Honorable Steny Hoyer
The Honorable Sherrod Brown
The Honorable Rob Portman
The Honorable Steve Stivers

Ms Pelosi and Gentlemen,

I watched Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Thune make their case for the Keystone XL Pipeline Project on C-Span this afternoon. While I do not agree with their assessment, that is not the point of this email. The point is – Why is the Republican leadership choosing to attach this to the Payroll Tax Extension legislation when in fact it should stand on its own merits and deserves a separate vote? Are you concerned it cannot pass on its own merits? Or you cannot garner sufficient bipartisan support to override a Presidential Veto? If you choose to reply, please address the questions in this Email.

President Obama requested clean legislation, and identified well in advance any legislation containing the Keystone XL Pipeline Project included as part of the Payroll Tax Extension would be vetoed. The Payroll Tax Extension has a hard, fast, and immediate deadline, the Keystone XL Pipeline Project does not. To have chosen to include the two together is using valuable time that is necessary to reach an agreement on the principle issue and can only be viewed in this independent’s view as playing politics with peoples lives - hence the opening questions.

Thank you,

Robert B. Claussen
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll . Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next

Announcements

Post of the Day:
Value Hounds

Not Cheering the Shire Deal
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and "#1 Media Company to Work For" (BusinessInsider 2011)! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement