No. of Recommendations: 1
The usual good reason for doing 'direct transfer' of IRA funds rather than receiving the funds and delivering them to the new place within 60 days is because in the latter case the firm paying the monies to you is required to withhold taxes. In the direct-transfer method the witholding of taxes is not required. The method suggested by the Ameritrade person should work fine. Provided the funds are already in a traditional IRA I don't believe that it should be necessary for the intermediate step that Ameritrade requires of them setting it up first as a traditional IRA and then later doing the roth conversion. But I do see lots of advantages to doing it the way they suggest. #1 is that if you find later that you want or need to do a 'Recharacterization' that the funds stay at Ameritrade which is what you probably would want. #2 is that the conversion is between your accounts at the single firm and things are less likely to go wrong. And if they do go wrong then you only have to deal with the one firm and not both. puff99
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.