Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
These are truly IMHO:


Multiple brand stable.
Strong engineering in the MB division which can (hopefully) be spread across product lines.
Some divisions very profitable (MB).
Possibility of global car platforms (Ford and Toyota do this, as examples)

Some divisions massively unprofitable (Chrysler)
Fabled MB has, despite engineering prowess, let the brand slip to 10th in European reliability study (see yesterday's WSJ)
US/German culture clash
While 2001 Sales were huge for Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge product lines, they were often unprofitable. Also, the 0% financing got consumers used to cheap financing, while potentially taking sales away from 2002.
Chrysler/Dodge is still not able to compete in the family sedan category.

Chrysler must massively cut costs while maintaining value and reliability.

Chrysler is still the mini-van king. If it can maintain this while coming up with viable sedan and SUV choices, it could win.
MB's Starmark program has shown phenomenal success with used car buyers. If it could make a similar program work for Chrysler/Dodge, it would be a huge win.

Here is the hook I would use for your report: Were the Germans sold a bill of goods?

Off topic: Thank you so much for being part of the Fool Community!

Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.