Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 3
They have trotted out that argument for every group they wished to exclude. Blacks, Japanese (during WWII especially...they ended up with their own unit, the 442nd), gays, and now women.

The only requirement for serving in combat roles should be the necessary abilities for a given role. If a person (man or women) doesn't possess that ability, they should not occupy that role. If they do possess it, then they should be eligible for the position. The state of their gonads, nor the amount of melanin in their skin, nor whom they consider 'hot', should not be relevant.

1poorguy
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement