UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next
Author: bjdArch Big red star, 1000 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 255  
Subject: Re: Skyscrapers and the 21st Century Date: 1/1/2001 3:56 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 4
This is, of course, one of the most frustrating and difficult dilemmas facing environmental and urban planners today. I think that the suburban sprawl/urban decline relationship is much more complex than a simple cause and effect. The birth of the suburb, like the birth of the skyscraper, occured sometime at the end of the 19th century, and the former could well have been the result of the latter.

The appeal of wide open spaces and low buildings was only palpable because of the relatively squalid conditions of the industrial urban landscape. Yet it was those cities that provided not only the economic structure of the community, but the political structure as well. As the citizens (note the root word civic) moved out of the city for the suburbs, the physical structure (urbs) was obviously abandoned, but more important was the abandonment of the political structure and the implementation of an unsuccessful and impotent political structure in the suburbs. As a result, the motivating imperatives of suburban form are almost entirely commercial. What's more, the predominence of the suburban lifestyle in our cultural identity has rendered us almost incapable of imagining a regime where other imperatives might be eminent. And so, commerce rules.

So, among the factors that have lead us to our current sprawl one must include not only cheap land and the development of relatively efficient transportation systems (keep in mind that most sprawl is handsomly facilitated by generous tax-payer subsidies in the form of ever increasing road construction, next time you vote) but the remarkably screwed-up priorities that we have adopted. On the other hand, urban redevelopment will still be impossible without a sustainable economic foundation.

After recently sitting in suburban Mall traffic, I believe we are getting very close to the kind of intolerable conditions that could result in a watershed of spirit. Just as the squalor of the industrial city highlighted the virtues of the rural, it's conceivable that the relentless grind of our overburdened and massively expensive transportation infrastructure (read: car culture) will become unbearable, and cities will be seen as a virtuous alternative. But that reordering of priorities will have to be manifest in a restructuring of the political landscape (read: systems of governance) before it will result in the successful restructuring of the physical landscape.

Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post  
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (9) | Ignore Thread Prev | Next


Post of the Day:
Fool One Central

Look at the Total Risk
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.