Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
This is severe cherry-picking of data (as the Op Ed page of the WSJ is wont to do on this subject). Since 1990 (the Kyoto baseline) the US has increased CO2 emissions by *20%* :

That's on top of a baseline that was already something like 5x the world's average (per head). At least the WSJ is finally (implicitly) accepting that reducing CO2 is a good thing, although they point to a reduction in growth for their favorite 4 year period, rather than an actual reduction in emissions.
What the WSJ doesn't say is whether they think it's therefore OK for the US to sign up for Kyoto because the US's retarded approach to energy management and global warming is somehow so naturally superior to Europe's that it will create superior reductions in CO2 going forwards. If they are not happy with that, why not?

Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.