Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 1
This seems a simple adjustment. I would suggest 2 -- they may have the salutory effect of encouraging more selections.

1. A tie in accuracy goes to the CAPS player with MORE picks.

2. A tie in accuracy goes to the CAPS player whose average active pick's holding period is LONGER.


I really like this idea!

First, it will help 'normalize' the distributions of accuracy rankings by quite a bit (which has been a bit of a problem).

Additionally, It will help solve the "there's a huge tie for #457 in accuracy and one is either #457 or #1,032 in accuracy with nobody inbetween them" problem.

Regards,

Russell


Print the post  

Announcements

When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement