No. of Recommendations: 0
In the earlier thread we discussed insurance a bit, and it sounds like there is general agreement to NOT buy insurance to cover the routine things, but only for catastrophic events. We do this by purchasing high deductable policies that are much cheaper than lower deductable policies. This question is basically about the other end, or the high limits. I have always assumed you want an umbrella policy with a limit about equal to your net worth... under the assumption that for most liability events the policy will protect your assets.

For instance, lets say you have $1M in assets, and a $1M umbrella. If somebody wins a $2M judgement they collect $1M from your insurance, and you get to keep your $1M. I believe there are cases where this is not true, but those generally involve criminal conduct rather than simple liability. Is this consistent with what others (experts if available) believe or know? If not, is there some reasonable sources or beliefs about how much insurance one should have to protect themselves from liabilities?
Thanks in advance,
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.