Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Next Thread
Author: tjbd Big red star, 1000 posts Old School Fool Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: of 8764  
Subject: Time to give up MSFT? Date: 2/18/2000 7:25 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
http://www.redherring.com/insider/2000/0217/tech-microsoft021700.html

Here's an excerpt:

On the eve of one of Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT)'s most significant product
introductions, a dozen venture capitalists sat around a room scratching their
heads. The question before them: "Is Microsoft dead?"

It wasn't a joke. The VCs, who had gathered Tuesday at a private function
to discuss investing trends, had been arguing about the one stock that
investors should hold for the next five years. Everyone agreed on Cisco
Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO). They haggled over Amazon.com (Nasdaq:
AMZN) and eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY). But the company that wrought so
much havoc in the marketplace that the government took it to court wasn't
mentioned. Not once.
Print the post Back To Top
Author: scrim1 Big red star, 1000 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 964 of 8764
Subject: Re: Time to give up MSFT? Date: 2/18/2000 8:39 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
If you bought Microsoft years ago, then i might keep it. I wouldn't buy it today..

Actually, if i bought MS years ago, i'd probably sell it and buy Cisco.

I could see all sorts of devices taking away from Microsoft, yet all these devices (game consoles, set-top-boxes) will all increase demand for Cisco's products.

Print the post Back To Top
Author: jpcienkus One star, 50 posts Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 969 of 8764
Subject: Re: Time to give up MSFT? Date: 2/19/2000 6:40 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
How do set top boxes and gaming boxes increase the need for network routers and other Cisco products? I own the stock and will continue to hold. Also, I would not count out Microsoft. Buy on the dips.

Print the post Back To Top
Author: FreeFlyingFool Three stars, 500 posts Old School Fool CAPS All Star Add to my Favorite Fools Ignore this person (you won't see their posts anymore) Number: 970 of 8764
Subject: Re: Time to give up MSFT? Date: 2/19/2000 8:56 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Recommendations: 0
jpcienkus wrote:
How do set top boxes and gaming boxes increase the need for network routers and other Cisco products? I own the stock and will continue to hold.

The reason that non-PC devices help Cisco is that they will all be connected to the net. In some cases (e.g. the Palm VII), the bandwidth required to service such a device is relatively small. In others (e.g. set-top boxes doing video on demand), the bandwidth required is huge. When you consider the literally billions of 3G cellular phones to be produced in the next ten years, the continued drive to push bandwidth the last mile, the growth of wireless providers like Metricom, and software technologies like Java and Jini which are making networking increasingly ubiquitous, you realize that not only are there going to be billions more devices attached to the net in 2010, but that we'll be spending more and more time using the net. All of that adds up to a need for bandwidth that makes todays networks look like childrens' toys.

Who's going to supply that bandwidth? Dollars to doughnuts it's Cisco.

I bought Cisco over a year ago for exactly this reason. I had just gotten a cable modem, and enjoyed the speedy connection. It wasn't hard to predict that millions of others would enjoy it as well (indeed, lots of other people were predicting that). Given that, it seemed reasonable to believe that a lot of service providers, backbone providers, and destination websites, indeed just about everybody attached to the net, would ultimately have to upgrade their networking equipment to accomodate.

I can't really comment on Microsoft other than to say that I'd rather invest in Cisco.

--
FreeFlyingFool


Post New | Post Reply | Reply Later | Create Poll Report this Post | Recommend it!
Print the post Back To Top
UnThreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) | Ignore Thread Prev Thread | Next Thread
Advertisement