No. of Recommendations: 0
TrudyKAS writes:

<<We've gone round and round on this previously elsewhere, some people drawing close parallels between index funds and Spiders. They do track closely from day to day in price. The principal difference, as I see it, has to do with your individual investment objective if you are not in a tax deferred situation. Index funds have low expense ratios, but they are recurring. That is, you pay the fee each year. That .48% fee can compound to a sizable sum over perhaps 15 or 20 years. The Spiders, on the other hand, when held over a comparable period of time, have broker fees for buying and selling, but no annual additional expenses. So a 1% or 2% one time brokerage cost would be less over time than annual fees! Any comments?>>

Just one: You won't get an argument from me. The same sum invested in one versus the other gives the edge to Spiders over the long haul provided the broker charges no account maintenance fee due to lack of trading. Many do, but for funds it's built into the administrative fee. And BTW, the 48 basis points you cite for the fund is high. Vanguard's is half that.

Darn…. That's three comments. I'm just gonna have to learn how to count.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.