http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&ncid=519&e=28&u=/ap/20050428/ap_on_re_us/abortion_dispute

Sure, the kid's young. Young enough to know that she doesn't want to carry the kid to term! It's beyond patronizing that she's supposedly "too young" to articulate her medical needs, but she's apprently quite old enough to bear a child to term. Those hypocritical b*st*rds.

A pox on the Bush house. You axe funding for and access to programs that could provide BC to this kid, then you have the gall to deny her medical care when-surprise!-she ends up pregnant.

Sticking your collective heads in the sand is not going to change the fact that kids are having sex at younger and younger ages. Then again, it's not like the GOP has a problem with the idea of a nation full of knocked up teenagers with no recourse. @ssh)les.

HLP
Writing Planned Parenthood a check as we speak