I just returned from Omaha where Cathy Shenoy, director of our applied portfolio management program, and I took KU Finance Scholars and Finance Club officers (27 students in all) to Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. headquarters for a question and answer session with Warren Buffett. In addition to KU, students from Creighton University, Emory University, the University of South Dakota, Penn State University, and the University of Texas were represented. Berkshire is planning 8 such events this year for 48 schools and roughly 1,300 students. The itinerary is a two-hour Q&A with Warren at “World Headquarters,” lunch at a local restaurant (in our case, Piccolo Pete’s Steak House) was followed by pictures. Warren bought lunch.Anyone interested in the quality of top business students from around the country would be delighted with what transpired. The students were uniformly respectful, courteous, and energized. They asked thoughtful questions that deserved the well-considered responses offered by Warren. In professional business attire, the students looked and acted the part of up and coming business executives. Students asked questions that they themselves had conceived. This was definitely a student-led endeavor. In fact, no faculty at all accompanied students from UT or Penn State. Penn State students not only secured their invitation, they arranged the trip and paid their own expenses. KU student expenses were covered by Scott Jones (Prairie Wind Capital), a generous former student.In roughly chronological order, the two-hour discussion proceeded as follows:1. Buffett sees things in the financial markets that he’s never seen before, nor did he ever expect to see them. For example, Berkshire recently bought a three-month T-bill that involved a small amount of negative interest. Buffett joked that the mattresses sold by Nebraska Furniture Mart were a better place to put your money. Presently there is a bubble in U.S. Treasury securities. Credit spreads have gone from far too narrow a couple of years ago to far too wide today. Money can be made shorting Treasuries and going long corporate bonds, provided you can play out your hand. Excessive amounts of leverage used by hedge funds have resulted in enormous losses from sensible bets because players could not play out their hands. Buffett told a silly joke about how tough things were in the financial sector. “I know off a Wall Street investment banker who got no bonus this year. He came home and told his wife that they’d have to really cut back. “If you could learn to cook,” he said, “we could lay off the kitchen staff.” She replied, “If you could learn how to make love, we could lay off the gardener too.”” 2. Buffett has bet against the U.S. dollar from time to time, but would never bet against the United States. Human welfare in the United States has grown by seven fold during the last century thanks to our rule of law and meritocracy. Central planning and class-based societies based upon inherited wealth are far inferior. With the present 7.6% unemployment rate, the United States is under producing but will come out of the current downturn just fine. Warren expressed admiration for the Chinese manufacturer behind the “Build Your Own Dreams” initiative (http://www.desmogblog.com/directory/vocabulary/3741).3. Derivatives are “weapons of mass destruction” (WMDs). In a now familiar refrain, Buffett said once again that derivatives are financial WMDs. Financial derivatives create big problems when executives get paid annual bonuses based on their current valuation of long-tail derivatives. When Berkshire bought GeneralRe they had 100-year derivatives! Berkshire presently holds lots of financial derivative contracts, Buffett said, but Berkshire always holds the financial collateral. Counter party risk is huge. Buffett likened the counter-party risk tied to financial derivatives to the counter-party risk with venereal disease. “The problem isn’t just who you’re sleeping with, it’s also all the other people that person is sleeping with. Before you know it, the disease spreads and the whole emergency ward is filled up.” Buffett has long regarded real WMDs as the biggest threat faced by society today. With modern knowledge, capability, and deliverability, any maladjusted crackpot can do enormous damage. In the days of the cave man, they threw rocks. Now they have nuclear capability. Berkshire is fortified to withstand simultaneous nuclear attacks in New York and Washington, DC.4. “If you were just coming out of school today, would you look for stock-market bargains in the financial sector?” “You don’t get rich by making sector bets,” Buffett replied, “but there are lots of bargains in the financial sector right now. Not just stocks, but bonds and some other financial securities are also cheap. Who would have predicted that Bank of America (BAC) would fall from the 50s to less than 4?” All young people should be cautious about the dangers of debt. He also admonished the students to develop the right kinds of habits, “The chains of habit are too lightly felt until they are too heavy to be broken.” In a joking reference to being hard of hearing, Buffett said he recently told Charlie Munger: “Charlie, we should buy GE at 11.” No response. Moving closer, Buffett said once again, “Charlie, we should buy GE at 11.” Again, no response. Finally, Buffett moved up close and shouted in Charlie’s ear. “Charlie, we should buy GE at 11!” Charlie turned to him and said, “For the third time, Warren, YES.” (Note: Berkshire has disclosed big positions in U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo, and small positions in GE and BAC).5. “Berkshire Hathaway has made big insurance investments. Is Berkshire apt to get into health insurance in a big way?” “No,” Buffett quickly replied. He does not want to get into types of insurance where buyers may not understand what coverage they have or can expect. Harley Davidson bonds should do well. “It’s a wonderful business when customers are willing to tattoo your name on themselves,” Buffett said.6. “What mistakes did Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson make prior to and during the current credit crisis?” Buffett said that his friend Hank Paulson did almost an impossible job under the most trying of circumstances. With 535 senators and members of congress, all with different incentives and agendas, it is impossible to satisfy everyone. Moreover, when one approach to dealing with the crisis got criticized or shot down, the problem escalated, and the necessary remedy grew. Hank Paulson, Fed chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner are all real public servants who do their best for the country at great personal sacrifice. During the election campaign, Buffett told candidate Barack Obama that he had good news and bad news to relate about the economy. “Give me the good news first,” Barack replied. “Well, the good news is that the economy is so bad that you’ll get elected. The bad news is that the economy will be worse on Inauguration Day.” Barack paused and quipped: “Is it too late to throw the election?”7. “Will the stimulus package work?” Buffett said that monetary policy has been exhausted, and classical Keynesian fiscal policy stimulus is all that’s left. Proposed fiscal policies are much better than sitting back and doing nothing. However, the power of fiscal stimulus is limited. When FDR took over, for example, he had an unlimited ability to get things passed quickly. While the U.S. unemployment rate fell from 25 percent to 9 percent by 1939, the U.S. economy never fully recovered from the Great Depression until World War II. Today, we could have the Federal Government put everybody to work making capital equipment, or battle ships, and take them out into the ocean and sink them, but that would not be as beneficial as current plans to stimulate the production of capital goods and services that will be used over time. Still, Buffett admonished, we have to be careful. “When it comes to economic policy, you never do just one one thing at a time.” (Note: Meanwhile, Janet Yellen, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank and a voting member of the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee in 2009 told reporters Friday that the Fed needed to fight back against the notion that its liquidity efforts would inevitably lead to higher inflation and higher interest rates, terming the notion "ludicrous." http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090207/bs_nm/us_usa_fed_yellen_...).8. Ovarian lottery: The students loved Buffett’s “ovarian lottery” allegory. Suppose a genie confronted you with the following opportunity. Take a large barrel filled with 6.5 billion tickets, each representing a single birth outcome. Assume the genie selected 100 tickets at random from the barrel and offered to switch your own birth outcome for the best of those 100 tickets. Only about 50 would be of above average intelligence, fewer still would have supportive parents, or full physical capability. Less than 5% would be born in the United States. Nobody in the room would take that offer. Upshot: We are in the upper 1% by chance alone, and should want to give something back to society.9. Buffett on money: Buffett said he has everything he wants. The house he lives in is the only one he wants; it’s got lots of pleasant memories. He does not want an entourage of servants, employees, or hangers on. Buffett has no interest in 12 houses nor a 65’ boat. He gets invited to all the parties he wants, and leads a happy, simple life. Buffett says the average CEO lives like royalty, and he wants nothing of that (“I’d rather deliver newspapers,” Buffett said). Over the last several years, the only material things that have improved Buffett’s material well-being are his computer and his airplane. The computer he uses to play bridge was free; the plane costs about $1.5 million per year. If he had to give one up, Buffett doesn’t know which one it would be. He doesn’t have to give either up so he‘ll keep ‘em both. Money is nice, but it can’t buy you love. Love is only gained through behavior. The room turned silent—you could hear a pin drop-- when Buffett told the story of his Jewish friend, an Auschwitz concentration camp survivor, who told Warren she had a hard time making friends. “The question I always ask myself,” she says, “is would they hide me?”10. Playing bridge is a favorite pastime. “You will never get the same hand twice, it’s a partnership game, and each hand is informative but never definitive.” Buffett likens playing bridge to the investment process. It’s also good mental exercise. Speaking of which, Buffett says he’s not as quick as he was 30 years ago, but he has much better judgment, especially regarding human relationships and human behavior. He credits his wife with teaching him about people. On okbridge.com Buffett is “T-bone” while his friend Bill Gates is “Chalenger.” “Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard during his junior year,” Buffett said, “apparently, spelling is a senior-level course.” (http://www.okbridge.com/)All in all, it was a virtuoso stand-alone performance blending of the fresh with the familiar. Buffett was flawlessly quick, witty, and charming. No Berkshire aides were visible anywhere. Buffett entered the Q&A session alone, chatted amiably for more than two hours nonstop, drove a handful of students to lunch, jumped right in and sat down at a table that was quickly filling with students, and then gabbed and hammed it up for another hour or so of photo ops with students. Buffett is happy and every Berkshire shareholder has every reason to be so as well.Think of it as a memorable afternoon performance of Hal Holbrook as “Mark Twain Tonight” except that Mark Twain showed up to do the performance. It was a remarkable visit with a man remarkable for his intelligence, wit, and generosity. It was a virtuoso performance of “Warren Buffett as Himself.”Mark
Great post.The only thing I thought I'd add is that GE closed at $11.10.Jim
Jim,While I too can see the appeal of BAC and GE, the clearest message I got on Friday was to buy more Berkshire.I plan to do just that.Mark
Wait a minute..For example, Berkshire recently bought a three-month T-bill that involved a small amount of negative interest. If that's the case, now we know the answer to the question of who would make an investment that's guaranteed to lose money...http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/12/11/a-governmen...I just never thought it would be Buffett & Berkshire.
"For example, Berkshire recently bought a three-month T-bill that involved a small amount of negative interest. "That must be a typo. We thought of shorting the Treasuries also, but the profit potential is small you don't have a huge capital base. And we don't want to use leverage.With Buffett's capital, that is a sure bet. Negative interest is one of very few times when Mr. Market retreated too far.But percentagewise, that sure bet won't yield you much without leverage.Buffett's mind is clearly at its prime. I guess those who sold BRK may need to rethink:http://zenway.com/d/node/55#comment-46
While I too can see the appeal of BAC and GE, the clearest message I got on Friday was to buy more Berkshire.I plan to do just that.Me too. I'm out of investable cash, so I'm having to sell other things to buy BRK.Most recently, I sold some Wellpoint to do so, Jan 30th. And I love Wellpoint.I just couldn't resist more B's at under $2,900.As for the GE comment, I was just pointing out that for those reading a great write-up but capable only of seeing a stock tip, it was at least a timely anecdote.Jim
Would it be crazy to quit my job so I could sign up for B-school on the chance that I could get a few hours in a group with Buffett?Great post! Next best thing to being there! Thanks!R:
<<"For example, Berkshire recently bought a three-month T-bill that involved a small amount of negative interest. "That must be a typo.>>Something that throws light on this kind of investment: I met someone who works in the treasury department of my employer last week and now have a whole new appreciation for the challenge of finding safe places to park cash in the current environment.To net it out: a US treasury with slightly negative interest rate might actually have a lower "value at risk" than depositing the same amount in a bank -- a bank that might be here one week and gone the next. With billions of dollars of opaque toxic debt on bank balance sheets, that's a real downside risk.If you calculate "dollars x chances of getting all your money back" then a negative interest treasury might actually be a better figure. This is particularly a problem for companies that are cash rich, as there often is not enough of a particular security for it to be viable as a place to make a large, short term, liquid investment.I'm not saying my employer has these kinds of treasuries (I actually don't know) -- just that there's more to it than rate of return when the banking system is under such stress.Digerati
I'm out of investable cash, so I'm having to sell other things to buy BRK.Most recently, I sold some Wellpoint to do so, Jan 30th. And I love Wellpoint.I just couldn't resist more B's at under $2,900.I've been casually tracking the price relationship between WFC and BRKb since November 2007, when I first bought 120sh of WFC and set my account to DRIP the dividend. At the time, that amount of stock was equivalent to less than a B-share, and I bought WFC in part as a "second-best" because I didn't have enough to buy a baby B.From the end of 2007 through 2008 there were at least two occasions I noticed where those WFC shares would, if sold, net out to one B-share with a few hundred dollars left over. I was tempted whenever I'd see that. On the last day of last year, it happened a third time, and on impulse I sold 106 sh. WFC and bought a B-share, leaving me with ~20 WFC shares left over. Little did I know WFC share price would proceed to bomb in the first part of 2009 like it did.The lesson? I don't think there is one, but I suspect it might be hubristic to think I got lucky. Only time will tell whether I was smart or dumb for swapping.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |