Wasn't there a remark in today's testimony that a force of 60 would have been insufficient?You would have us believe that it was crucial to have our ambassador in Benghazi on 9/11, with security deteriorating, repeated attacks on western assets, insufficient security, etc..........that "no means of defense would have been possible"???How about for starters the least expensive.......don't put your ambassador there on 9/11 for pete sake.You are complicit in this charade by Obama to hide the truth about the Muslim states..........Obama's placating strategy has been an abject failure..........you cannot defend this charade and his outright lies immediately after when everyone knew it was terrorism.You choose party over country......not me.
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra