No. of Recommendations: 0
Well, I can offer a few thoughts. The main advantage with option 3 (self-directed 401K via Schwab) is that you do not limit your investment options. . .you can invest in individual stocks or mutual funds, etc. It really is no different than if you had an IRA with Schwab. However, I do not like the $50 per quarter ($200 per year) fee. What is this fee supposed to cover? It would seem to me the $29 dollar commission should be sufficient. I think you need to compare this $50 per quarter fee (percentage wise) against the amount you are contributing to the 401K . . .off the top of my head, it would seem to be a pretty steep fee.

If you are satisfied with the 12 mutual funds offered in your first option, this might be the simplest way to go and should provide a decent rate of return over the next 30 years . . .again, however, with Schwab you have unlimited choices of mutual funds.

Hope this gives you some food for thought.

Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.