Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
 
No. of Recommendations: 0
Well said, Fuskie, but let me clarify a bit.

5) Morningstar Rating. I never hurts to get the advice of a professional and Morningstar has a long history of analyzing mutual funds. A fund rating of 5 Stars is desired, 4 acceptable, but you might want to think twice about 3 or lower.

A Morningstar fund rated 3 stars is average. A professionally managed fund that does as well as its peers is OK with me. But one with 2 stars or less is an under performer, which should be avoided.

I'll agree that funds that are consistently rated 4 or 5 stars are clear winners, but the problem is that most 5 star funds fail to repeat. Hence, they had a lucky streak but are not truly better than the pack.

4 or 5 stars is not a good predictor of future performance. But consistently average performance is OK by me. Its the underachievers I worry about.

But this is personal choice. Either way can work. You decide which is best for you.
Print the post  

Announcements

What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement