Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 1
Well the easiest thing would be to just treat the cost basis as zero. Of course then you'd be overpaying on your tax.

I didn't fully follow everything but it sounds like you had 1 share of stock at FMV in 1966 plus $50 as your basis, and everything else has been the result of that?

If so would your basis, if you could calculate it correctly, be much higher than zero?
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.