Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0
My wife & I are in a high (36%) tax bracket (but live in a state with no income tax) and have quite a few non-qualified stock options from her employer. When I was taught Black-Schole in school, they said hold on to options as long as possible. Now, as I look at the tax consequences of exercising, I am wondering if it isn't better to exercise sooner rather than later, in order to pay less of the gain as income and more as long-term capital gains, especially if you would hold onto them for the long term anyway.

I realize I may need some professional advise here, but I'd like to mull over the problem first.

Is my analysis anywhere close to the mark?

Since this effort would cost a bit of money, it would probably curtail other investing activities; what kind of numbers would I have to see to make exercising early preferable to, say, FF investing?

Would I be better off exercising later options (higher strike price), earlier options (lower strike price) or is it irrelevant?

Are there any other factors I should consider?

Is there a book I should pick up that might talk about these "problems"?
Print the post  


In accordance with IRS Circular 230, you cannot use the contents of any post on The Motley Fool's message boards to avoid tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.