No. of Recommendations: 0
who thinks, with the cost of health insurance, he would be better with option 2

I'm confused by this. I guess I wasn't clear. In option 1 he would pay his own insurance via the company - I'm estimating $38 per bi-monthly paycheck. In option 2, I'd add him to my insurance at work which would raise my premiums by $51 per bi-monthly paycheck.

I don't really think the insurance is the issue. I realize that the FICO, taxes, etc. would be paid by us directly in option 2, but since I'm a CPA, I have no problem dealing with this.

The real issue I'm thinking is the loss of the tax deductibility of his 401(k) contributions plus the 3% matching. We'd have only taxable accounts available to us, I believe. Unless the SEP IRA option would be available.

I'm just trying to check my math and make sure I'm not missing anything. Taxes, FICO, etc. will be the same in either case, just whether we write a check directly or it's subtracted from his checks before we get them.

thanks for your reply
Print the post  


The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.