Why would anyone of objective logic doubt it, given the actual evidence?Given what evidence?Your posted 'expert' disclaims *one* point of evidence, and then simply 'declares' “You should not be so suspicious about this,”... hardly defensible objective logic or evidence.</i.That's not true. First, Tremblay is Fox's expert, not mine. Second, he explains his analysis in the article and didn't "simply 'declare'" the conspiracy theorists are wrong. Third, what other "point-of-evidence" is there beside the claim that "layering" is proof of tampering?Even the Birthers' "experts" have walked back on this. What you got left?
Best Of |
Favorites & Replies |
Start a New Board |
My Fool |
BATS data provided in real-time. NYSE, NASDAQ and NYSEMKT data delayed 15 minutes.
Real-Time prices provided by BATS. Market data provided by Interactive Data.
Company fundamental data provided by Morningstar. Earnings Estimates, Analyst Ra