Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0

Wall Street Journal has article on Monsanto today. Interview with CEO Hugh Grant. In my view the article is off target from the point of view of investors. He opens with earnings data and the defeat of the recent ballet item in California that would have required labeling of GMO modified foods. Grant had an opportunity to address the safety data on GMO foods.

The focus is negative. Author associates Monsanto with its chemical background and Agent Orange. I have heard that before for Dow but not for Monsanto--not that Monsanto did not have its problems with PCBs.

Article ends with discussion of global warming, but ends with the idea this is a threat to the future of Monsanto. But no mention of the drought tolerant corn that Monsanto plans to market this spring.

Other items investors would like to know were omitted too--

1) The battle for market share vs Dupont in the US and Latin America
2) The imports of cheap Glyphosate herbicide from China that reduced margins on Roundup a few years ago.
3) The supreme court challenge to planting second generation soybean seeds

The article was fluffy compared to what I expect from the Wall Street Journals. It was not up to standards.

But then if you read the comments posted on the site. Bizarre. Nearly all are from opponents to GMO food, and pesticides, favoring organic crops.
Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.