Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 0

XT wrote previously:

I am sure we can all agree that there is no "holy grail" algorithm that solves all problems and that AIM in its standard book form can't be improved. Please remeber we are all here for the same basic reason!

I hereby revise my previous reply:

1 I agree there no "holy Grail" algorithm that solves all problems. But that does not mean we should not ry to make wat we have better, unless it already proven to be the best we can get.

2 AIM in it standard book form....I say there is no "standard form". Right from the beginning even Lichello was flexible enough to see that variations had merit. He said somehing to the effect that his method was tolerant enough to accept buy/sell excecutions different than the strict numbers being generated form his scheme. In effect, therefore, Lichello agreed that playing with the numbers such as SAFE and the AMOUNT bought or sold was perfectly alright.

Thus, if we considere the basics that Lichello presented then I do not agree that it can't be improved....Lichello would not have agreed to that!

Lichello-by-the-book CAN be improved...and we try to figure out HOW!


Print the post  


When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.