No. of Recommendations: 0
Yo Pixy!

In reply to message number 474 by TMFPixy :

<<<So, if I did that, the tax deferred account would get bigger faster. By age 45 (or possibly earlier), I might be able to retire. However, I'd have to start the early withdrawal stuff. But if the calculations use life expectancy, the portions may not be enough to live on each year.>>

If you ran the numbers correctly, then why bother with approach 2 at all? 72t withdrawals are a hassel, and approach 1 not only gave you enough money, you didn't have to hit the IRAs until 59 1/2. Approach 2 may not give you enough. To me, that in and of itself argues against it.>

I didn't run the numbers yet for the second way. But, the numbers should just be bigger the second way. There are lots of tax benefits before retirement. Almost certainly, I'd be able to retire earlier...

I'll run the numbers and see.

-Tom
Print the post  

Announcements

The Retirement Investing Board
This is the board for all discussions related to Investing for and during retirement. To keep the board relevant and Foolish to everyone, please avoid making any posts pertaining to political partisanship. Fool on and Retire on!
What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.
Advertisement