Message Font: Serif | Sans-Serif
No. of Recommendations: 2
You guys already know this but I like one board per article. It's about having a consistent, dependable, dedicated resource for any term whose page you're on. Anything else just fuzzies things up.


At first blush, a board for every term is an organized and simple way to do it, but I have concerns I shared with Jeremy privately earlier.

1. Only admins can currently open boards. We would need a tech process to allow editors to create a board and link to it. That opens other security concerns.

2. Redundancy: Are editors going to search for an appropriate board before creating new ones? If every permutation of a term has its own board, it creates the fuzziness you want to avoid.

3. If the intention is to link from the article page to specific conversation about the term, why not link to a thread in a category board? Anyone can start a new thread in an existing board without needing permissions or tech processes, and all of the conversation would be in that thread instead of scattered in multiple threads on a discrete board.

My 2 centavos :)

Print the post  


What was Your Dumbest Investment?
Share it with us -- and learn from others' stories of flubs.
When Life Gives You Lemons
We all have had hardships and made poor decisions. The important thing is how we respond and grow. Read the story of a Fool who started from nothing, and looks to gain everything.
Community Home
Speak Your Mind, Start Your Blog, Rate Your Stocks

Community Team Fools - who are those TMF's?
Contact Us
Contact Customer Service and other Fool departments here.
Work for Fools?
Winner of the Washingtonian great places to work, and Glassdoor #1 Company to Work For 2015! Have access to all of TMF's online and email products for FREE, and be paid for your contributions to TMF! Click the link and start your Fool career.